Is maintenance mandatory — even for vacant or rented flats?
Yes — completely and unconditionally. Maintenance charges are mandatory for every flat owner in India, regardless of whether the flat is occupied, vacant, locked, or rented out. This is one of the most commonly contested issues in housing societies, and the Supreme Court has settled it clearly.
The legal basis is the concept of collective ownership of common areas. As a flat owner, you have an undivided share in the lifts, corridors, stairwells, water tanks, generators, swimming pools, gardens, and all other common facilities. Your share of these costs does not disappear because you chose not to occupy the flat. The building still needs to be maintained, secured, and operated — and every owner must contribute proportionately.
Specific positions across recent cases:
- Karnataka HC (2024) in Shangrila Flat Owners Association v. Capt. Mohan Prabhu — A chronic defaulter argued that the association's maintenance accounts were irregular and refused to pay. The High Court held that this was not a valid defence. Even if there are irregularities in accounts, the proper remedy is to report them to the competent authority, not to refuse payment. Refusal by one member hinders the welfare of all others and constitutes breach of the deed of declaration.
- Supreme Court position — Maintenance fees collected by cooperative societies are not taxable (principle of mutuality), confirming they are genuine expenses shared by all members for their collective benefit.
- Rented flats — The owner is responsible to the society for maintenance. Many owners pass this on to the tenant in the rental agreement, which is permissible between the parties — but the society deals only with the owner. If the tenant fails to pay and the agreement requires them to, the owner's remedy is against the tenant, not the society.
How maintenance charges are calculated
This is the source of most society disputes. Three methods are used across India:
Method 1: Equal division (per unit / flat basis)
All flat owners pay the same amount regardless of flat size or type. A 1BHK owner pays the same as a 4BHK owner. This method is simple and administratively easy. Under Maharashtra law, this has historically been the legally mandated basis for cooperative housing societies under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. A Mumbai Co-operative Court restrained a society in January 2025 from shifting to per-square-foot basis without a proper legal basis — ordering reversion to per-unit billing until the dispute is resolved.
Method 2: Per-square-foot basis (proportional)
Larger flats pay more, in proportion to their carpet area or undivided share in the common area. This method is used by condominiums registered under state Apartment Ownership Acts (separate from cooperative society law). The Bombay High Court upheld this method in August 2025 in Sachin Malpani v. Nilam Patil for a condominium registered under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act — holding that Section 10 of that Act requires charges to be proportionate to the undivided interest in the common area. A 4BHK flat owner tried to resist paying proportionately more — the court said they must pay based on their larger share of the common area.
Method 3: Hybrid
A base fixed charge for all units plus a variable per-square-foot component for some services. Common in gated communities where some costs (security, basic amenities) are equally shared and others (parking, extra water, premium amenities) are based on unit size or usage. This method must be clearly documented in the bylaws.
Whether your society can use per-unit or per-square-foot charging depends on the governing document — the registered bylaws, deed of declaration, or sale agreement. The managing committee cannot unilaterally change the calculation method. Any change requires a resolution passed at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) or Special General Meeting by the required majority (usually 2/3 or 3/4 of members). A unilateral change in calculation method by the managing committee alone can be challenged before the Registrar or Cooperative Court.
What does maintenance cover — and what it should not
Maintenance charges typically cover a defined list of expenses. Knowing what is permitted helps you spot overcharging.
| Component | Permitted? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Security staff salaries | ✓ Yes | Core common expense |
| Housekeeping and cleaning | ✓ Yes | Common areas only — not individual flats |
| Lift maintenance | ✓ Yes | AMC, electricity, repairs |
| Water charges | ✓ Yes | Bulk water supply to the building |
| Generator/DG set electricity | ✓ Yes | For common area power backup |
| Garden/landscaping maintenance | ✓ Yes | Common areas |
| Building insurance | ✓ Yes | Structure insurance for the complex |
| Sinking fund | ✓ Yes (separate) | Must be maintained in a separate account for major repairs |
| Repairs to individual flats | ✗ No | Interior repairs are individual owner's responsibility |
| Personal parking charges above standard | Only if in bylaws | Must be disclosed and approved |
| Profit or management fees to builder | ✗ No | Supreme Court ruled maintenance cannot be a profit-making activity |
| Penalty or interest on late payment | Only if in bylaws | Must be specified in bylaws; cannot be arbitrarily imposed |
The sinking fund — what it is and how it is often misused
The sinking fund (or major repair/capital replacement fund) is a mandatory reserve collected separately from regular maintenance charges. Its purpose is to accumulate money for major future expenses — building repainting, lift replacement, water pump overhaul, structural repairs — that occur infrequently but cost large sums.
Legal requirements for the sinking fund
- Under Maharashtra Cooperative Society rules, the sinking fund contribution must be at least 0.25% of the construction cost of each flat per year
- It must be maintained in a separate bank account — it cannot be mixed with the regular maintenance fund
- It can only be used for major capital repairs, not routine maintenance
- Any use of the sinking fund requires approval from the general body at an AGM
- Accounts must be audited annually and the audit report shared with all members
Common misuses of the sinking fund
- Using sinking fund for routine monthly expenses (paying security guard salaries)
- Not maintaining it in a separate account — mixing with maintenance funds
- Using it without general body approval
- Not collecting it at all and spending everything on routine expenses
- Managing committee drawing from it without disclosing to members
Misuse of the sinking fund can be reported to the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. The managing committee can be held personally liable for any loss caused by misuse. Members can demand an audit by the Registrar under cooperative society law.
Society overcharging or misusing maintenance funds?
Free, confidential, in your language. Our AI will tell you whether your complaint is legally valid and exactly which authority to approach.GST on housing society maintenance charges
GST at 18% is applicable on maintenance charges collected by housing societies, cooperative housing societies, and apartment owners associations under the following conditions:
When GST applies
- Monthly maintenance charge per flat exceeds ₹7,500, AND
- The society's total annual turnover exceeds ₹20 lakhs
When GST does NOT apply
- Monthly maintenance per flat is ₹7,500 or less — exempt regardless of turnover
- Society's annual turnover is ₹20 lakhs or less — exempt regardless of per-flat amount
The threshold is per flat per month, not per building. If your flat's monthly maintenance is ₹12,000, GST of 18% (₹2,160) applies on the entire ₹12,000. If it is ₹7,000, GST does not apply.
Some societies split the monthly bill into "maintenance" and "other charges" to bring each component under ₹7,500 and avoid GST. The GST department has clarified that all charges collected by the society for maintenance purposes must be aggregated to determine the ₹7,500 threshold — the total maintenance charge to the flat owner is what matters, not how it is split on the bill. If the total exceeds ₹7,500, GST applies.
Society's GST obligations
If GST applies, the society must:
- Register for GST (if not already done)
- Issue proper GST-compliant tax invoices to each flat owner
- File GST returns (monthly or quarterly depending on turnover)
- Deposit collected GST to the government
A society that collects GST from residents but does not deposit it with the government, or that does not issue proper tax invoices, can be reported to the GST Department. Members can inspect the society's GST returns at the society office.
Who pays maintenance for a rented flat?
This is one of the most frequently confused issues between landlords and tenants in India. The answer has two distinct layers:
Layer 1: Society vs flat owner (landlord)
The housing society's relationship is with the flat owner (the member). The society can only recover maintenance charges from the registered member, not from a tenant. If maintenance is not paid, the society will send notices to and take action against the flat owner, not the tenant.
Layer 2: Landlord vs tenant (internal arrangement)
Between landlord and tenant, the rental agreement determines who pays. Three common arrangements:
- Tenant pays directly — the agreement states the tenant shall pay maintenance directly to the society or reimburse the landlord. The landlord should provide the tenant with society receipts/bills as proof that the actual charges are being charged correctly.
- Landlord pays from rent — the rent is set at a level that covers the maintenance, and the landlord pays the society directly. The tenant never deals with the society.
- Separate in agreement — rent is separate; tenant pays "maintenance" component directly; both amounts specified in the agreement.
Practical protections for tenants
- If the landlord claims the society maintenance is ₹X, ask for the actual society bills as proof
- Never pay "maintenance" to a landlord in cash without receipts and without seeing the society's official bill
- If the landlord inflates the maintenance figure above what the society actually charges, that excess is not your liability
- If the landlord fails to pay the society despite collecting maintenance from you, the society will block your access to amenities (not cut your personal electricity, but they may restrict common amenity access). Document all your payments and approach the society to show you have paid the landlord
Amenity denial — when societies discriminate
A growing problem in metro gated communities: societies that deny access to amenities (gym, pool, clubhouse, play area) to certain residents — smaller flat owners, tenants, bachelors, non-members. This is increasingly being challenged in courts.
The April 2026 Karnataka incident
A gated community in Karnataka made headlines when it denied 1BHK and 1RK residents access to the swimming pool and gym despite charging them full maintenance. The incident went viral. Legal experts confirmed that if residents are paying maintenance charges for common amenities, denying access to those amenities on the basis of flat size is discriminatory and legally indefensible. Residents were advised to: file a complaint with the Registrar of Cooperative Societies; issue legal notice to the RWA Chairman; and document the denial with video evidence for consumer court proceedings.
The legal position on amenity access
- If you pay maintenance that covers specific amenities, you have the right to use those amenities
- Discrimination based on flat size, type, or ownership (owner vs tenant) in access to common facilities violates the basic principle of collective ownership
- Societies can legitimately restrict access to amenities for non-payment of maintenance arrears (provided their bylaws permit this)
- Societies cannot restrict amenities for residents who are current on payments, purely based on flat size or type
- A separate maintenance category ("premium amenity charges") for pool/gym can exist, but then those residents who do not pay that specific charge are the ones who can be denied — not the residents who have paid
Builder and developer maintenance disputes
Before a Residents Welfare Association (RWA) or Apartment Owners Association (AOA) is formed, the builder typically manages maintenance. This is the source of significant disputes.
RERA rules on pre-possession maintenance
- Builders cannot collect maintenance charges before handing over possession of the flat — this was settled in Utpal Trehan v. DLF Home Developers Ltd. (2022)
- Builders can collect advance maintenance in advance only for a maximum of one year at a time
- Maintenance charges must be disclosed in the sale agreement before the buyer signs — they cannot be added after
- The builder must maintain a separate maintenance account — maintenance collections cannot be mixed with project construction funds
- The builder cannot treat maintenance collections as profit — they must be used only for maintenance
Transfer to AOA/RWA
Once the project is complete and the AOA/RWA is formed, the builder must transfer the maintenance corpus and accounts to the association. Delay in this transfer is a common complaint. If the builder delays or refuses to transfer, file a complaint before RERA. Most state RERA regulations have specific provisions requiring builders to hand over the maintenance fund within a specified time after formation of the residents' association.
Need help with a society dispute or RERA complaint?
Book a verified housing lawyer for ₹99. They'll assess your specific situation and tell you which forum to approach and how to build the strongest complaint.How to resolve a maintenance dispute — your complete toolkit
Forum 1: Registrar of Cooperative Societies (primary forum)
For cooperative housing society disputes (which covers the majority of housing societies in India), the Registrar of Cooperative Societies is the primary administrative forum. The Registrar can:
- Inquire into financial irregularities and misuse of funds
- Order the production and audit of accounts
- Direct correction of wrongful charges
- Remove the managing committee in serious cases and appoint an administrator
- Impose penalties on the society or its officers for violations
Filing a complaint with the Registrar is free or involves minimal court fees. It is the fastest administrative route. In Maharashtra, complaints against cooperative housing societies go to the Deputy Registrar or the Sub-Divisional Officer (depending on the nature of the dispute).
Forum 2: Cooperative Court
For specific monetary disputes — recovery of excess maintenance paid, compensation for denied amenities, challenge to illegally imposed charges — the Cooperative Court has jurisdiction. Cooperative Courts function like civil courts but specifically for cooperative society disputes. Available in Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat, and some other states.
Forum 3: Consumer Commission
For complaints involving deficiency of service — the society failing to maintain promised amenities, the builder not delivering promised facilities, poor quality services despite full payment — the District Consumer Commission is appropriate. Consumer cases must be filed within 2 years of the cause of action. You can claim: refund of excess charges, compensation for substandard service, interest on overpaid amounts, and cost of litigation.
Forum 4: RERA
For disputes involving the builder/developer — charging maintenance before possession, not disclosing maintenance charges in the sale agreement, not transferring the maintenance fund to the AOA, failure to provide promised amenities — file before your state RERA authority. RERA's jurisdiction ends once the project is fully handed over and the AOA is formed; thereafter, it is the cooperative courts that handle disputes.
Forum 5: Civil Court / High Court
For cases involving fundamental legal questions (challenging the legality of a bylaw amendment, challenging the formation of the AOA, constitutional questions about discrimination) — the Civil Court or High Court is the appropriate forum. Also applicable where no specific cooperative court/RERA forum exists for the nature of the dispute.
Society maintenance — questions people actually ask
Can the society put my name on a "defaulters list" for non-payment?
Yes — most cooperative society bylaws permit the managing committee to display a list of defaulting members at the notice board. This is a legitimate administrative measure to prompt payment, not defamation. However, if the society puts your name on a defaulters list incorrectly (you have paid, or the amount claimed is disputed and sub-judice), that could be defamation — send a legal notice to the Secretary demanding immediate removal.
Can the society refuse to give me an NOC for flat sale if I have maintenance arrears?
Yes. Most cooperative housing societies are entitled to withhold the No Objection Certificate (NOC) required for transferring the flat until all maintenance arrears (including penalty and interest as per bylaws) are cleared. The buyer cannot become a member of the society until the NOC is issued. This is a strong practical incentive for sellers to clear dues before selling. Any disputes about the arrears amount should be resolved before initiating the sale process.
How do I get the society's financial accounts?
As a member of a cooperative housing society, you have a statutory right to inspect the society's accounts and financial records. Under cooperative society law (state-specific, e.g., Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act), members can demand to see the annual accounts, audit report, bank statements, maintenance collection records, and sinking fund account. Submit a written request to the Secretary. If refused, file a complaint with the Registrar — this right cannot be denied to a member in good standing.
Can the society pass a resolution at AGM to suddenly double the maintenance?
The AGM has wide powers over maintenance — it can revise the maintenance amount, change the calculation method, and create new funds. However, the increase must be: (a) justified by actual cost increases (audited accounts); (b) passed by the required majority; and (c) notified to members in advance with proper AGM notice (typically 21 days). An arbitrary doubling without any cost justification can be challenged before the Registrar on grounds of unreasonableness or illegality. Courts have held that society charges must reflect actual expenses — they cannot be inflated arbitrarily.
What if the managing committee is corrupt and misusing maintenance funds?
File a complaint with the Registrar of Cooperative Societies immediately. The Registrar can order a special audit, freeze the society's accounts, and refer the matter for criminal investigation if fraud is suspected. Additionally, 1/5th of the members can call a Special General Meeting to remove the managing committee through a vote of no confidence. Keep all evidence — bank statements, receipts, accounts books — and if criminal conduct is suspected (embezzlement), file an FIR as well. The managing committee members can be personally liable for any loss caused by fraud or gross misuse.
Is parking charges part of maintenance?
Parking charges are a separate item from regular maintenance. Under many cooperative society bylaws, parking spaces are either allotted to members or managed as common areas. Any charge for parking must be specified in the bylaws and approved by the general body. Unilateral imposition of parking charges by the managing committee without bylaw authority can be challenged. For open parking spaces in common areas, the society cannot charge individual members beyond what the bylaws permit.